PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YACKX vs. SVAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YACKX vs. SVAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YACKX achieves a 19.98% return, which is significantly higher than SVAAX's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, YACKX has outperformed SVAAX with an annualized return of 12.64%, while SVAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.


YACKX

1D
-0.44%
1M
5.67%
YTD
19.98%
6M
5.18%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
12.64%

SVAAX

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.60%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YACKX vs. SVAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YACKX
AMG Yacktman Fund
19.98%1.34%13.15%15.46%-7.50%19.66%15.25%27.49%2.79%18.25%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
8.72%14.42%16.29%-2.07%8.07%21.36%-8.15%19.42%-8.44%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between YACKX and SVAAX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between YACKX and SVAAX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YACKX vs. SVAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YACKX
YACKX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
YACKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YACKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
YACKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
YACKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
YACKX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SVAAX
SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YACKX vs. SVAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YACKXSVAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

5.06

-4.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

13.74

-10.74

YACKX vs. SVAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YACKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the SVAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YACKX and SVAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YACKXSVAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.32

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.77

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.52

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.48

+0.23

Drawdowns

YACKX vs. SVAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YACKX drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, smaller than the maximum SVAAX drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YACKX and SVAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YACKXSVAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-51.16%

+4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.30%

-4.71%

-11.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.30%

-12.84%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.86%

-16.17%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.93%

-36.47%

+5.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-3.33%

+2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.27%

-8.21%

+2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.57%

2.60%

+2.97%

Volatility

YACKX vs. SVAAX - Volatility Comparison

AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) at 3.60%. This indicates that YACKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YACKXSVAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

3.60%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.61%

7.37%

+12.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

10.30%

+9.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.10%

13.65%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.15%

15.39%

+0.76%

YACKX vs. SVAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

YACKX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than SVAAX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

YACKX vs. SVAAX - Dividend Comparison

YACKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
5.88%5.80%7.38%4.10%9.49%3.50%4.06%8.55%8.39%10.16%5.00%8.45%
YACKX
AMG Yacktman Fund
0.00%0.00%17.32%4.39%7.35%3.72%10.82%16.84%23.06%10.67%8.57%13.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


YACKX and SVAAX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YACKX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to SVAAX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YACKX dropped -46.65% vs SVAAX's -51.16%.

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YACKX and SVAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer