PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYZG vs. PTIR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYZG vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZG achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -46.20% return.


XYZG

1D
-11.57%
1M
-8.12%
YTD
-3.28%
6M
8.21%
1Y
-15.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PTIR

1D
-13.01%
1M
-8.99%
YTD
-46.20%
6M
-46.23%
1Y
-21.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYZG vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XYZG and PTIR is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYZG vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYZG
XYZG Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
XYZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYZG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
XYZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYZG Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PTIR
PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYZG vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYZGPTIRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.05

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

-0.32

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

-0.55

+0.13

XYZG vs. PTIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZG Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is comparable to the PTIR Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZG and PTIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYZGPTIRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

-0.21

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.98

-1.84

Drawdowns

XYZG vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZG drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, roughly equal to the maximum PTIR drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZG and PTIR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYZGPTIRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.40%

-69.10%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.40%

-68.11%

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.04%

-62.92%

+17.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.06%

-27.47%

-1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.60%

39.55%

-1.95%

Volatility

XYZG vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) is 25.78%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 36.75%. This indicates that XYZG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYZGPTIRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.78%

36.75%

-10.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.80%

77.20%

-6.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.87%

103.10%

-10.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

103.71%

129.58%

-25.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

103.71%

129.58%

-25.87%

XYZG vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYZG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIR's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYZG vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison

XYZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, less than PTIR's 10.80% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XYZG and PTIR have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTIR has higher volatility (36.75%) compared to XYZG (25.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZG dropped -69.40% vs PTIR's -69.10%.

On 1-year performance, XYZG leads with -15.62% vs -21.52% for PTIR. On fees, XYZG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XYZG has been the lower-risk option at 25.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XYZG has performed better with a -15.62% return vs -21.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XYZG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for PTIR.

PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 10.80%, compared with 6.92% for XYZG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XYZG and 1.15% for PTIR.

XYZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYZG and PTIR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer