XYZG vs. MULL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XYZG (Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XYZG returned -15.62% vs 6074.28% for MULL. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XYZG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MULL.

Performance

XYZG vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZG achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 936.86% return.

XYZG

• 1D: -11.57%
• 1M: -8.12%
• YTD: -3.28%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: -15.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: 216.81%
• YTD: 936.86%
• 6M: 1,369.93%
• 1Y: 6,074.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYZG vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF	-3.28%	21.85%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	936.86%	1,249.87%

Correlation

The correlation between XYZG and MULL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	0.18

Return for Risk

XYZG vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYZG

XYZG Risk / Return Rank: 9
XYZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XYZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
XYZG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
XYZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XYZG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 99
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYZG vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XYZG	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	46.71	-46.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	7.02	-6.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.89	-0.84
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	116.34	-116.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	390.40	-390.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XYZG vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZG Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 46.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZG and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XYZG	MULL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	46.71	-46.88
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	7.45	-7.30

Drawdowns

XYZG vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZG drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, roughly equal to the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZG and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XYZG	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.40%	-72.29%	+2.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.40%	-53.09%	-16.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.04%	0.00%	-45.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.06%	-20.62%	-8.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.60%	15.79%	+21.81%

Volatility

XYZG vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) is 25.78%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 55.41%. This indicates that XYZG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XYZG	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.78%	55.41%	-29.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.80%	105.59%	-34.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.87%	132.38%	-39.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	103.71%	136.22%	-32.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	103.71%	136.22%	-32.51%

XYZG vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYZG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XYZG vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

XYZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than MULL's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.04%	0.39%
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF	6.92%	6.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XYZG and MULL in my portfolio?

XYZG and MULL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XYZG or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (55.41%) compared to XYZG (25.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZG dropped -69.40% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, XYZG or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 6074.28% vs -15.62% for XYZG. On fees, XYZG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XYZG has been the lower-risk option at 25.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XYZG or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 6074.28% return vs -15.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XYZG or MULL?

XYZG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MULL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XYZG or MULL?

XYZG has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 0.04% for MULL.

What is the main difference between XYZG and MULL?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XYZG and 1.50% for MULL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (46.71 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.