XYZG vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XYZG (Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XYZG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. XYZG is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, XYZG returned -15.62% vs 1800.91% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. XYZG charges 0.75%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

XYZG vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZG achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.

XYZG

• 1D: -11.57%
• 1M: -8.12%
• YTD: -3.28%
• 6M: 8.21%
• 1Y: -15.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: 9.15%
• YTD: 875.88%
• 6M: 735.56%
• 1Y: 1,800.91%
• 3Y*: 129.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYZG vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF	-3.28%	21.85%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	875.88%	82.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XYZG and BWET is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

XYZG vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYZG

XYZG Risk / Return Rank: 9
XYZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
XYZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
XYZG Omega Ratio Rank: 12
XYZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
XYZG Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYZG vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XYZG	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	18.57	-18.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.40	6.55	-6.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.96	-0.91
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	59.51	-59.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.42	158.07	-158.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XYZG vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZG Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 18.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZG and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XYZG	BWET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	18.57	-18.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	1.90	-1.75

Drawdowns

XYZG vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZG drawdown since its inception was -69.40%, which is greater than BWET's maximum drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZG and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	XYZG	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.40%	-56.90%	-12.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.40%	-30.64%	-38.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.04%	-11.29%	-33.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.06%	-24.09%	-4.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	37.60%	11.51%	+26.09%

Volatility

XYZG vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF (XYZG) is 25.78%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that XYZG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XYZG	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.78%	33.96%	-8.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	70.80%	88.49%	-17.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.87%	98.35%	-5.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	103.71%	70.45%	+33.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	103.71%	70.45%	+33.26%

XYZG vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYZG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XYZG vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

XYZG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%
XYZG Leverage Shares 2X Long XYZ Daily ETF	6.92%	6.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XYZG and BWET in my portfolio?

XYZG and BWET have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XYZG or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to XYZG (25.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZG dropped -69.40% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, XYZG or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1800.91% vs -15.62% for XYZG. On fees, XYZG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XYZG has been the lower-risk option at 25.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XYZG or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1800.91% return vs -15.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XYZG or BWET?

XYZG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XYZG or BWET?

XYZG has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between XYZG and BWET?

XYZG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XYZG and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.