PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYZ vs. QTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XYZ vs. QTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Block, Inc (XYZ) and Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYZ achieves a 6.81% return, which is significantly higher than QTWO's -39.18% return. Over the past 10 years, XYZ has outperformed QTWO with an annualized return of 22.83%, while QTWO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.96% annualized return.


XYZ

1D
0.62%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
6.81%
6M
7.37%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
1.99%
5Y*
-20.53%
10Y*
22.83%

QTWO

1D
1.32%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
-39.18%
6M
-41.72%
1Y
-50.39%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
-15.41%
10Y*
4.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYZ vs. QTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYZ
Block, Inc
6.81%-23.41%9.88%23.09%-61.09%-25.79%247.89%11.54%61.78%154.37%
QTWO
Q2 Holdings, Inc.
-39.18%-28.31%131.86%61.56%-66.18%-37.22%56.06%63.63%34.46%27.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XYZ and QTWO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2015

0.51

The correlation between XYZ and QTWO shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

XYZ:

$41.54B

QTWO:

$2.97B

EPS

XYZ:

$1.31

QTWO:

$1.07

PE Ratio

XYZ:

53.09

QTWO:

40.92

PS Ratio

XYZ:

1.75

QTWO:

3.68

PB Ratio

XYZ:

1.91

QTWO:

4.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

XYZ:

$24.48B

QTWO:

$821.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

XYZ:

$11.01B

QTWO:

$456.61M

EBITDA (TTM)

XYZ:

$2.42B

QTWO:

$105.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYZ vs. QTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYZ
XYZ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XYZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
XYZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

QTWO
QTWO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
QTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYZ vs. QTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Block, Inc (XYZ) and Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYZQTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.78

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

-0.93

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.52

-1.46

+1.98

XYZ vs. QTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the QTWO Sharpe Ratio of -1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYZ and QTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYZ vs. QTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYZ drawdown since its inception was -86.08%, roughly equal to the maximum QTWO drawdown of -85.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYZ and QTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYZQTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.08%

-85.77%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.48%

-54.53%

+15.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.96%

-60.92%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.08%

-80.69%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.08%

-85.77%

-0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.33%

-70.08%

-5.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-41.05%

-30.24%

-10.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.15%

34.50%

-17.35%

Volatility

XYZ vs. QTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Block, Inc (XYZ) is 12.79%, while Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) has a volatility of 17.04%. This indicates that XYZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYZQTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.79%

17.04%

-4.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.49%

32.97%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.91%

44.18%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.99%

50.07%

+9.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.70%

44.28%

+12.42%

Dividends

XYZ vs. QTWO - Dividend Comparison

Neither XYZ nor QTWO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

XYZ vs. QTWO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Block, Inc and Q2 Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
6.06B
216.51M
(XYZ) Total Revenue
(QTWO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

XYZ vs. QTWO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Block, Inc and Q2 Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
48.0%
59.1%
Portfolio components
XYZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Block, Inc reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 6.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.0%.

QTWO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 127.91M and revenue of 216.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.1%.

XYZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Block, Inc reported an operating income of -171.99M and revenue of 6.06B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.

QTWO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 27.69M and revenue of 216.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

XYZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Block, Inc reported a net income of -308.68M and revenue of 6.06B, resulting in a net margin of -5.1%.

QTWO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Q2 Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 26.64M and revenue of 216.51M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


XYZ and QTWO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTWO has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to XYZ (12.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYZ dropped -86.08% vs QTWO's -85.77%.

XYZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYZ and QTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer