PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLU.L vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XYLU.L vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XYLU.L vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XYLU.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD
-0.93%7.85%19.71%1.97%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
23.45%6.90%6.11%-8.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLU.L achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 23.45% return.


XYLU.L

1D
1.64%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
4.92%
1Y
11.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XOMO

1D
-4.29%
1M
2.32%
YTD
23.45%
6M
31.32%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XYLU.L vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XYLU.L vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLU.L
XYLU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XYLU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLU.L vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLU.LXOMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

1.02

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

1.40

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.47

-0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.38

3.35

+5.03

XYLU.L vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is comparable to the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLU.L and XOMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLU.LXOMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

1.02

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.55

+0.38

Correlation

The correlation between XYLU.L and XOMO is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XYLU.L vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

XYLU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.69%, less than XOMO's 30.57% yield.


TTM202520242023
XYLU.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD
10.69%10.48%8.49%3.88%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
30.57%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Drawdowns

XYLU.L vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum XOMO drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLU.L and XOMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLU.LXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-18.90%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-15.24%

+3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-5.12%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-7.05%

+4.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

6.69%

-5.41%

Volatility

XYLU.L vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) is 3.77%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that XYLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XYLU.LXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.77%

6.57%

-2.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.83%

13.81%

-7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

22.02%

-8.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.66%

18.46%

-7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

18.46%

-7.80%