PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLU.L vs. QRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XYLU.L vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XYLU.L vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XYLU.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD
-2.53%7.85%19.71%0.64%
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
-2.50%3.76%14.72%-0.75%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XYLU.L having a -2.53% return and QRMI slightly higher at -2.50%.


XYLU.L

1D
0.74%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-2.53%
6M
3.23%
1Y
9.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QRMI

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.37%
YTD
-2.50%
6M
1.31%
1Y
2.76%
3Y*
6.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XYLU.L vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLU.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XYLU.L vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLU.L
XYLU.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XYLU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLU.L vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLU.LQRMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.79

0.36

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.14

0.55

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.08

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

0.55

+0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.51

1.59

+3.92

XYLU.L vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the QRMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLU.L and QRMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLU.LQRMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.36

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.09

+0.77

Correlation

The correlation between XYLU.L and QRMI is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XYLU.L vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

XYLU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, less than QRMI's 12.66% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
XYLU.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD
10.86%10.48%8.49%3.88%0.00%0.00%
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.66%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%

Drawdowns

XYLU.L vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLU.L drawdown since its inception was -17.20%, smaller than the maximum QRMI drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLU.L and QRMI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLU.LQRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.20%

-20.95%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-5.04%

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-3.54%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-8.25%

+6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.74%

-0.05%

Volatility

XYLU.L vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (XYLU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 3.02%. This indicates that XYLU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XYLU.LQRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

3.02%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.61%

4.93%

+0.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

7.77%

+5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.62%

8.46%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.62%

8.46%

+2.16%