PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLP.L vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XYLP.L vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XYLP.L vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XYLP.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF
-0.62%-1.18%19.03%1.10%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
25.49%-0.72%7.97%-9.06%
Different Trading Currencies

XYLP.L is traded in GBP, while XOMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XOMO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLP.L achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 25.49% return.


XYLP.L

1D
0.46%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
-0.62%
6M
4.19%
1Y
4.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XOMO

1D
-4.51%
1M
3.48%
YTD
25.49%
6M
33.54%
1Y
19.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XYLP.L vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLP.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XYLP.L vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLP.L
XYLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
XYLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLP.L vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLP.LXOMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.42

0.84

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.63

1.20

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.17

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

1.17

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.37

2.09

+1.28

XYLP.L vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLP.L and XOMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLP.LXOMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

0.84

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.42

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between XYLP.L and XOMO is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

XYLP.L vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

XYLP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, less than XOMO's 30.57% yield.


TTM202520242023
XYLP.L
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF
8.00%9.01%6.22%3.98%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
30.57%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Drawdowns

XYLP.L vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLP.L drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, smaller than the maximum XOMO drawdown of -21.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLP.L and XOMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLP.LXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.30%

-18.90%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-15.24%

+6.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.01%

-5.12%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-7.05%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.48%

6.69%

-5.21%

Volatility

XYLP.L vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call UCITS ETF (XYLP.L) is 3.02%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that XYLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XYLP.LXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

7.36%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.92%

14.37%

-8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.82%

23.12%

-11.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.60%

19.66%

-9.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

19.66%

-9.06%