PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. PDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. PDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than PDI's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, XYLD has outperformed PDI with an annualized return of 8.17%, while PDI has yielded a comparatively lower 7.27% annualized return.


XYLD

1D
0.27%
1M
2.23%
6M
6.22%
YTD
7.16%
1Y
17.29%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
8.17%

PDI

1D
-0.98%
1M
1.02%
6M
-3.03%
YTD
0.21%
1Y
-0.26%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
2.77%
10Y*
7.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. PDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
7.16%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
0.21%11.03%17.18%11.99%-16.99%7.81%-9.96%22.23%7.35%18.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and PDI is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. PDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

PDI
PDI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDI Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. PDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLDPDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.01

+0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

-0.02

+3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.10

-0.05

+17.15

XYLD vs. PDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the PDI Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and PDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. PDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum PDI drawdown of -46.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and PDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDPDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-46.47%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-10.95%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-17.55%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

-27.19%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

-46.47%

+13.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.63%

+7.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-6.22%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

5.47%

-4.46%

Volatility

XYLD vs. PDI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 1.81%, while PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) has a volatility of 2.99%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDPDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

2.99%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.91%

8.51%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.94%

11.57%

-4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.28%

15.57%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.15%

19.05%

-4.90%

Dividends

XYLD vs. PDI - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.28%, less than PDI's 16.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
16.29%14.94%14.43%14.74%17.84%10.21%10.01%9.45%10.78%8.81%14.79%18.70%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.28%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and PDI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDI has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to XYLD (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs PDI's -46.47%.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and PDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer