XYLD vs. AMLP
XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XYLD returned 8.35%/yr vs 6.92%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for AMLP.
Performance
XYLD vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, XYLD has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 8.35%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.92% annualized return.
XYLD
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 8.35%
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 15.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
XYLD vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.83% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 15.29% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD and AMLP is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XYLD and AMLP has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XYLD vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XYLD
AMLP
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XYLD
AMLP
-
Financial Services
XYLD
AMLP
-
Communication Services
XYLD
AMLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
XYLD
AMLP
-
Healthcare
XYLD
AMLP
-
Industrials
XYLD
AMLP
-
Consumer Defensive
XYLD
AMLP
-
Energy
XYLD
AMLP
Utilities
XYLD
AMLP
Real Estate
XYLD
AMLP
-
Basic Materials
XYLD
AMLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLD vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
XYLD
AMLP
XYLD vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XYLD | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.22 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 1.66 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.57 | 5.35 | +11.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XYLD vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLD | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -77.19% | +43.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -8.94% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | -14.27% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.66% | -20.92% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.46% | -72.62% | +39.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -4.94% | +4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -17.37% | +13.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 2.77% | -1.76% |
Volatility
XYLD vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 2.17%, while Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLD | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.17% | 4.71% | -2.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.71% | 8.77% | -3.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.79% | 11.84% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.25% | 19.95% | -8.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 27.67% | -13.45% |
XYLD vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLD vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.53%, more than AMLP's 7.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.71% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.53% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLD and AMLP have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMLP has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to XYLD (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
On 10-year performance, XYLD leads with 8.35% vs 6.92% for AMLP. On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XYLD has performed better with a 8.35% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 7.71% for AMLP.
XYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMLP is MLPs. XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.90% for AMLP.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYLD and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer