PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. AMECX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. AMECX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XYLD having a 5.52% return and AMECX slightly lower at 5.48%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XYLD having a 8.33% annualized return and AMECX not far ahead at 8.39%.


XYLD

1D
0.27%
1M
1.69%
YTD
5.52%
6M
5.95%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
7.73%
10Y*
8.33%

AMECX

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
5.48%
6M
6.05%
1Y
14.23%
3Y*
12.78%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
8.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. AMECX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
5.52%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
5.48%17.77%10.84%6.79%-6.40%17.37%4.49%18.50%-5.27%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and AMECX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2013

0.73

The correlation between XYLD and AMECX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. AMECX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AMECX
AMECX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AMECX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMECX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMECX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
AMECX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMECX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. AMECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLDAMECXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.35

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.33

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.16

8.61

+8.55

XYLD vs. AMECX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the AMECX Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and AMECX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. AMECX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum AMECX drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and AMECX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDAMECXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-41.92%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-6.13%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-8.58%

-6.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

-15.78%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

-26.13%

-7.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.02%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.71%

-4.45%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.66%

-0.65%

Volatility

XYLD vs. AMECX - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX) have volatilities of 2.21% and 2.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDAMECXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

2.30%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.76%

5.82%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

7.41%

-0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.26%

9.47%

+1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.22%

10.69%

+3.53%

XYLD vs. AMECX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AMECX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLD vs. AMECX - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.46%, more than AMECX's 9.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMECX
American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A
9.55%9.94%6.38%2.93%6.98%6.67%2.80%5.01%7.48%4.26%3.09%5.09%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.46%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and AMECX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMECX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to XYLD (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs AMECX's -41.92%.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and AMECX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer