PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYL vs. MDLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

XYL vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xylem Inc. (XYL) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYL achieves a -18.57% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 18.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XYL has outperformed MDLZ with an annualized return of 10.54%, while MDLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.09% annualized return.


XYL

1D
0.94%
1M
1.38%
YTD
-18.57%
6M
-19.12%
1Y
-12.41%
3Y*
1.00%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
10.54%

MDLZ

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.39%
YTD
18.03%
6M
18.65%
1Y
-4.45%
3Y*
-1.98%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
6.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYL vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYL
Xylem Inc.
-18.57%18.78%2.57%4.77%-6.60%18.94%30.90%19.59%-1.01%39.50%
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
18.03%-7.03%-15.30%11.17%2.92%15.87%8.58%40.42%-4.27%-1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between XYL and MDLZ is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2011

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between XYL and MDLZ has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

XYL:

$4.02

MDLZ:

$2.68

PE Ratio

XYL:

27.36

MDLZ:

23.51

PS Ratio

XYL:

3.85

MDLZ:

1.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

XYL:

$6.97B

MDLZ:

$39.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

XYL:

$2.71B

MDLZ:

$11.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

XYL:

$1.41B

MDLZ:

$4.67B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYL vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYL
XYL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYL Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MDLZ
MDLZ Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MDLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYL vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xylem Inc. (XYL) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XYLMDLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.98

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.41

-0.17

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

-0.30

-0.61

XYL vs. MDLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYL Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the MDLZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYL and MDLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XYL vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYL drawdown since its inception was -46.69%, which is greater than MDLZ's maximum drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYL and MDLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLMDLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.69%

-42.52%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.04%

-25.93%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.04%

-29.00%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.69%

-29.14%

-17.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.69%

-29.74%

-16.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.30%

-12.59%

-14.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-11.03%

+0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.54%

14.70%

-1.16%

Volatility

XYL vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison

Xylem Inc. (XYL) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) at 5.46%. This indicates that XYL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLMDLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

5.46%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.34%

16.28%

+3.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.52%

22.26%

+2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.08%

19.52%

+6.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.30%

21.03%

+6.27%

Dividends

XYL vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison

XYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than MDLZ's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
3.13%3.60%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%
XYL
Xylem Inc.
1.51%1.17%1.24%1.15%1.09%0.93%1.02%1.22%1.26%1.06%1.25%1.54%

Financials

XYL vs. MDLZ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Xylem Inc. and Mondelez International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B202220232024202520260
10.08B
(XYL) Total Revenue
(MDLZ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


XYL and MDLZ have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XYL has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to MDLZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYL dropped -46.69% vs MDLZ's -42.52%.

MDLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYL and MDLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer