XXXX vs. NTSD
XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. XXXX is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XXXX charges 2.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
XXXX vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XXXX
- 1D
- -5.65%
- 1M
- -8.58%
- YTD
- 13.89%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 61.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NTSD
- 1D
- -2.11%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XXXX vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 38.68% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXXX and NTSD is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXXX vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
XXXX
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XXXX vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XXXX | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XXXX vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXXX | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.27% | -5.58% | -56.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.46% | -2.97% | -11.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.55% | -1.09% | -10.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.02% | — | — |
Volatility
XXXX vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXXX | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.48% | 25.11% | +24.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.18% | 25.11% | +36.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.18% | 25.11% | +36.07% |
XXXX vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXXX vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
Neither XXXX nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XXXX and NTSD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.
XXXX and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Max and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 2.95% for XXXX and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for XXXX and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer