XXX vs. RHRX
XXX (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF) and RHRX (RH Tactical Rotation ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. XXX is passively managed, while RHRX is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XXX charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.36%/yr for RHRX.
Performance
XXX vs. RHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XXX
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RHRX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 6.95%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 21.26%
- 1Y
- 40.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XXX vs. RHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | -2.30% |
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 18.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXX and RHRX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXX vs. RHRX — Risk / Return Rank
XXX
RHRX
XXX vs. RHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF (XXX) and RH Tactical Rotation ETF (RHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXX | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | 0.53 | -0.82 |
Drawdowns
XXX vs. RHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXX drawdown since its inception was -12.88%, smaller than the maximum RHRX drawdown of -25.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXX and RHRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXX | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.88% | -25.33% | +12.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | -0.34% | -4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.27% | -8.95% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.74% | — |
Volatility
XXX vs. RHRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXX | RHRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.35% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.35% | 13.19% | +10.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 19.03% | +4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 19.03% | +4.32% |
XXX vs. RHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than RHRX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXX vs. RHRX - Dividend Comparison
XXX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while RHRX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
RHRX RH Tactical Rotation ETF | 0.00% |
XXX CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and XRP 75/25 Strategy ETF | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XXX and RHRX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XXX is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XXX is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.36% for RHRX.
XXX has the higher dividend yield at 0.06%, compared with 0.00% for RHRX.
They also come from different issuers: Cyber Hornet and Adaptive. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for XXX and 1.36% for RHRX.
Find the right allocation for XXX and RHRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer