XWTS.L vs. GXLC.L
XWTS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C) and GXLC.L (SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Communications Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, from Xtrackers and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XWTS.L returned 10.80%/yr vs 10.33%/yr for GXLC.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XWTS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXLC.L.
Performance
XWTS.L vs. GXLC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XWTS.L is traded in USD, while GXLC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GXLC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWTS.L achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than GXLC.L's 1.82% return.
XWTS.L
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 24.71%
- 3Y*
- 26.85%
- 5Y*
- 10.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.80%
GXLC.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 1.82%
- 6M
- 1.93%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- 25.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- —
XWTS.L vs. GXLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XWTS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C | 3.66% | 28.97% | 34.65% | 47.43% | -37.76% | 16.03% | 22.50% | 26.25% | -6.04% |
GXLC.L SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF | 1.82% | 27.99% | 31.37% | 52.71% | -37.29% | 17.82% | 26.59% | 30.42% | -13.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWTS.L and GXLC.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2018 | 0.90 |
The correlation between XWTS.L and GXLC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
XWTS.L vs. GXLC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XWTS.L
GXLC.L
Communication Services
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
XWTS.L
GXLC.L
Technology
XWTS.L
GXLC.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XWTS.L
GXLC.L
-
Real Estate
XWTS.L
GXLC.L
-
Basic Materials
XWTS.L
-
GXLC.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XWTS.L
-
GXLC.L
-
Energy
XWTS.L
-
GXLC.L
-
Financial Services
XWTS.L
-
GXLC.L
-
Healthcare
XWTS.L
-
GXLC.L
-
Industrials
XWTS.L
-
GXLC.L
-
Utilities
XWTS.L
-
GXLC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XWTS.L vs. GXLC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWTS.L
GXLC.L
XWTS.L vs. GXLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) and SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XWTS.L | GXLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 2.04 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 7.66 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWTS.L | GXLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 1.50 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.54 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.70 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
XWTS.L vs. GXLC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWTS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.71%, roughly equal to the maximum GXLC.L drawdown of -45.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWTS.L and GXLC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWTS.L | GXLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.71% | -45.02% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.35% | -10.23% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.95% | -17.72% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.71% | -45.02% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.71% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -4.61% | +1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -9.89% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.73% | +0.12% |
Volatility
XWTS.L vs. GXLC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) is 4.13%, while SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that XWTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXLC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XWTS.L | GXLC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 4.41% | -0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 10.26% | +0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 13.94% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 19.08% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.97% | 19.81% | -1.84% |
XWTS.L vs. GXLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWTS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GXLC.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XWTS.L vs. GXLC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWTS.L nor GXLC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, XWTS.L and GXLC.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GXLC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXLC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XWTS.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWTS.L and 0.15% for GXLC.L.
Find the right allocation for XWTS.L and GXLC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer