XWTS.L vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
XWTS.L and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XWTS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. It was launched on Mar 16, 2016. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both XWTS.L and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XWTS.L or QQQ.
Performance
XWTS.L vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XWTS.L achieves a 28.89% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 21.78% return.
XWTS.L
28.89%
2.62%
10.50%
35.72%
11.40%
N/A
QQQ
21.78%
1.15%
10.25%
29.54%
20.42%
17.95%
Key characteristics
| XWTS.L | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.39 | 1.70 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.34 | 2.29 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.75 | 2.19 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.06 | 7.96 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.53% | 3.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.83% | 17.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.71% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.86% | -3.42% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XWTS.L vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWTS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between XWTS.L and QQQ is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XWTS.L vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XWTS.L vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
XWTS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XWTS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.61% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
XWTS.L vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWTS.L drawdown since its inception was -44.71%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWTS.L and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XWTS.L vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Communication Services UCITS ETF 1C (XWTS.L) is 4.93%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that XWTS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.