GXLC.L vs. GLDM
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).
GXLC.L and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GXLC.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. It was launched on Aug 15, 2018. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018. Both GXLC.L and GLDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GXLC.L vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GXLC.L vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLC.L SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF | -3.80% | 19.01% | 33.60% | 45.06% | -29.78% | 18.90% | 22.83% | 25.39% | -13.71% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 10.64% | 52.51% | 29.30% | 7.39% | 11.37% | -3.10% | 21.42% | 13.60% | 8.29% |
Different Trading Currencies
GXLC.L is traded in GBP, while GLDM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLDM values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLC.L achieves a -3.80% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 10.64% return.
GXLC.L
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -3.80%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- 22.40%
- 3Y*
- 23.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
GLDM
- 1D
- 3.47%
- 1M
- -9.24%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 23.32%
- 1Y
- 46.32%
- 3Y*
- 30.27%
- 5Y*
- 23.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GXLC.L vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GXLC.L vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
GXLC.L
GLDM
GXLC.L vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXLC.L | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.81 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 2.27 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.35 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | 2.73 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 10.51 | -2.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXLC.L | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.81 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 1.40 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.14 | -0.48 |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC.L and GLDM is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GXLC.L vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
Neither GXLC.L nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
GXLC.L vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -22.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC.L and GLDM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC.L | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -21.63% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -19.14% | +10.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.84% | -20.92% | -14.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.65% | -13.19% | +6.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -6.04% | -1.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 5.16% | -2.48% |
Volatility
GXLC.L vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) is 4.18%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that GXLC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC.L | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 11.26% | -7.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.52% | 23.02% | -13.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.32% | 25.71% | -9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 16.49% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.13% | 16.08% | +3.05% |