GXLC.L vs. XUCM.L
GXLC.L (SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF) and XUCM.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D) are both Communications Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD, from State Street and Xtrackers respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GXLC.L returned 11.50%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for XUCM.L. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GXLC.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XUCM.L.
Performance
GXLC.L vs. XUCM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
GXLC.L is traded in GBP, while XUCM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XUCM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXLC.L achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly higher than XUCM.L's 1.35% return.
GXLC.L
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 22.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- —
XUCM.L
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 20.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- —
GXLC.L vs. XUCM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLC.L SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF | 2.07% | 19.01% | 33.60% | 45.06% | -29.78% | 16.06% |
XUCM.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D | 1.35% | 15.71% | 40.12% | 47.96% | -34.78% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXLC.L and XUCM.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GXLC.L and XUCM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
GXLC.L vs. XUCM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GXLC.L
XUCM.L
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
GXLC.L
XUCM.L
Basic Materials
GXLC.L
-
XUCM.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
GXLC.L
-
XUCM.L
-
Consumer Defensive
GXLC.L
-
XUCM.L
-
Energy
GXLC.L
-
XUCM.L
-
Financial Services
GXLC.L
-
XUCM.L
-
Healthcare
GXLC.L
-
XUCM.L
-
Industrials
GXLC.L
-
XUCM.L
-
Real Estate
GXLC.L
-
XUCM.L
-
Technology
GXLC.L
-
XUCM.L
Utilities
GXLC.L
-
XUCM.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXLC.L vs. XUCM.L — Risk / Return Rank
GXLC.L
XUCM.L
GXLC.L vs. XUCM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D (XUCM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GXLC.L | XUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.23 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.36 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.15 | 7.94 | +1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXLC.L | XUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.38 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.56 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.63 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
GXLC.L vs. XUCM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXLC.L drawdown since its inception was -35.84%, smaller than the maximum XUCM.L drawdown of -40.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXLC.L and XUCM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXLC.L | XUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.84% | -40.10% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.66% | -8.65% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.45% | -22.33% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.84% | -40.10% | +4.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.54% | -4.15% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -10.81% | +3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.58% | -0.17% |
Volatility
GXLC.L vs. XUCM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (GXLC.L) is 4.36%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D (XUCM.L) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that GXLC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUCM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXLC.L | XUCM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 4.73% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 10.69% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 14.77% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.92% | 19.98% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 19.86% | -0.82% |
GXLC.L vs. XUCM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXLC.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XUCM.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXLC.L vs. XUCM.L - Dividend Comparison
GXLC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUCM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXLC.L SPDR® S&P® U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUCM.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Communication Services UCITS ETF 1D | 0.71% | 0.72% | 0.63% | 0.58% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, GXLC.L and XUCM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XUCM.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUCM.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXLC.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Comm Services NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXLC.L and 0.12% for XUCM.L.
Find the right allocation for GXLC.L and XUCM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer