XWFS.L vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XWFS.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XWFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XWFS.L returned 20.16%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for ACWI. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XWFS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

XWFS.L vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XWFS.L is traded in GBP, while ACWI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWI values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XWFS.L achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.54% return.

XWFS.L

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: -1.42%
• 6M: 2.61%
• 1Y: 13.19%
• 3Y*: 20.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACWI

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 6.13%
• YTD: 12.54%
• 6M: 12.37%
• 1Y: 30.08%
• 3Y*: 18.15%
• 5Y*: 12.47%
• 10Y*: 13.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XWFS.L vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XWFS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C	-1.42%	20.20%	29.08%	10.02%	-0.66%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	12.54%	13.69%	19.50%	16.16%	-5.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XWFS.L and ACWI is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022	0.45

Return for Risk

XWFS.L vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XWFS.L

XWFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 29
XWFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XWFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
XWFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 27
XWFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
XWFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 30

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 66
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XWFS.L vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XWFS.L	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	2.63	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	3.46	-1.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.50	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	4.01	-2.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.37	16.62	-12.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XWFS.L vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XWFS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XWFS.L and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XWFS.L	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	2.63	-1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.84	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.59	+0.22

Drawdowns

XWFS.L vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XWFS.L drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -38.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWFS.L and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	XWFS.L	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.47%	-38.18%	+21.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.64%	-7.53%	-2.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.47%	-17.98%	+1.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.98%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-26.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.91%	-0.56%	-2.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-5.14%	+1.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	1.81%	+1.20%

Volatility

XWFS.L vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) is 2.90%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that XWFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XWFS.L	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	3.34%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.62%	8.84%	+0.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.43%	11.50%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	14.19%	+1.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.02%	16.47%	-0.45%

XWFS.L vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XWFS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

XWFS.L vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

XWFS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.38%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
XWFS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XWFS.L and ACWI in my portfolio?

XWFS.L and ACWI have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XWFS.L or ACWI?

On fees, XWFS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XWFS.L or ACWI?

XWFS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

What is the main difference between XWFS.L and ACWI?

XWFS.L is categorized as Financials Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. XWFS.L tracks MSCI World/Financials NR USD, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XWFS.L and 0.32% for ACWI.