XWFS.L vs. XDWH.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE).
XWFS.L and XDWH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XWFS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. XDWH.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. Both XWFS.L and XDWH.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XWFS.L or XDWH.DE.
Key characteristics
| XWFS.L | XDWH.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 29.21% | 12.63% |
| 1Y Return | 39.50% | 17.94% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.74 | 1.85 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.78 | 2.62 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.53 | 1.33 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.66 | 2.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.02 | 8.54 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.85% | 2.15% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.19% | 9.91% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.26% | -26.08% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -4.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between XWFS.L and XDWH.DE is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
XWFS.L vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XWFS.L achieves a 29.21% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's 12.63% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XWFS.L vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XWFS.L and XDWH.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XWFS.L vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XWFS.L vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWFS.L nor XDWH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XWFS.L vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWFS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.26%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWFS.L and XDWH.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XWFS.L vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 2.62%. This indicates that XWFS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.