XWFS.L vs. ESIF.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L).
XWFS.L and ESIF.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XWFS.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Mar 4, 2016. ESIF.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Nov 18, 2020. Both XWFS.L and ESIF.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XWFS.L vs. ESIF.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XWFS.L vs. ESIF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XWFS.L Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C | -6.55% | 20.20% | 29.08% | 10.02% | -0.66% |
ESIF.L iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF | -6.23% | 54.55% | 20.09% | 18.81% | 8.00% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XWFS.L having a -6.55% return and ESIF.L slightly higher at -6.23%.
XWFS.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- -6.55%
- 6M
- -1.19%
- 1Y
- 10.12%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESIF.L
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- -8.31%
- YTD
- -6.23%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 26.02%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XWFS.L vs. ESIF.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XWFS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIF.L's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XWFS.L vs. ESIF.L — Risk / Return Rank
XWFS.L
ESIF.L
XWFS.L vs. ESIF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XWFS.L | ESIF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 1.26 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 1.67 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 1.76 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 6.10 | -3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XWFS.L | ESIF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.26 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.10 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between XWFS.L and ESIF.L is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XWFS.L vs. ESIF.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XWFS.L nor ESIF.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XWFS.L vs. ESIF.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XWFS.L drawdown since its inception was -16.47%, smaller than the maximum ESIF.L drawdown of -23.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XWFS.L and ESIF.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XWFS.L | ESIF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.47% | -23.55% | +7.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.10% | -12.55% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.96% | -8.69% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -4.18% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 3.53% | -0.14% |
Volatility
XWFS.L vs. ESIF.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XWFS.L) is 5.34%, while iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that XWFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XWFS.L | ESIF.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 8.18% | -2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 12.72% | -3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.31% | 18.30% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 18.12% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.16% | 18.13% | -1.97% |