PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XVV vs. XCLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XVV vs. XCLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XVV vs. XCLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XVV
iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF
-6.38%17.53%25.87%29.78%-21.46%7.29%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
-5.35%10.25%20.67%15.64%-12.93%3.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XVV achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than XCLR's -5.35% return.


XVV

1D
2.93%
1M
-5.54%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
-3.96%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*

XCLR

1D
1.50%
1M
-5.30%
YTD
-5.35%
6M
-3.90%
1Y
10.04%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XVV vs. XCLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XVV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XCLR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XVV vs. XCLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XVV
XVV Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XVV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

XCLR
XCLR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
XCLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCLR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XCLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCLR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XVV vs. XCLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XVVXCLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.96

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

1.27

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.89

5.31

+0.58

XVV vs. XCLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XVV Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the XCLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XVV and XCLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XVVXCLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

0.96

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.58

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between XVV and XCLR is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XVV vs. XCLR - Dividend Comparison

XVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than XCLR's 13.90% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
XVV
iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF
1.03%0.94%1.05%1.25%1.57%0.81%0.31%
XCLR
Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF
13.90%13.15%18.76%1.40%1.01%1.70%0.00%

Drawdowns

XVV vs. XCLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XVV drawdown since its inception was -27.20%, which is greater than XCLR's maximum drawdown of -14.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XVV and XCLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XVVXCLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.20%

-14.63%

-12.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-8.29%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.97%

-6.91%

-1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-4.82%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

1.98%

+0.88%

Volatility

XVV vs. XCLR - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) at 3.39%. This indicates that XVV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XVVXCLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

3.39%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

7.15%

+2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

10.52%

+8.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

10.58%

+7.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

10.58%

+6.89%