PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XVV vs. SDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XVV vs. SDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) and iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XVV achieves a 6.55% return, which is significantly higher than SDG's 5.30% return.


XVV

1D
-1.36%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
6.55%
6M
5.50%
1Y
22.18%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*

SDG

1D
-1.89%
1M
-2.71%
YTD
5.30%
6M
4.80%
1Y
20.41%
3Y*
6.40%
5Y*
-0.46%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XVV vs. SDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XVV
iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF
6.55%17.53%25.87%29.78%-21.46%29.19%16.13%
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF
5.30%20.19%-10.09%4.59%-11.51%-1.20%19.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XVV and SDG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.68

The correlation between XVV and SDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XVV vs. SDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XVV
XVV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XVV Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
XVV Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SDG
SDG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XVV vs. SDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) and iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XVVSDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.36

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.02

8.43

+0.59

XVV vs. SDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the SDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XVV and SDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XVV vs. SDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XVV drawdown since its inception was -27.20%, smaller than the maximum SDG drawdown of -30.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XVV and SDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XVVSDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.20%

-30.35%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-8.68%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-22.92%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.20%

-30.35%

+3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-4.78%

+1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-9.62%

+3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.43%

+0.03%

Volatility

XVV vs. SDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) is 5.00%, while iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF (SDG) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that XVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XVVSDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

5.94%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.53%

12.01%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.29%

15.02%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.72%

15.79%

+1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

16.64%

+0.74%

XVV vs. SDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XVV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SDG's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XVV vs. SDG - Dividend Comparison

XVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than SDG's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SDG
iShares MSCI Global Sustainable Development Goals ETF
1.72%2.00%1.95%1.77%1.82%1.66%0.97%1.39%2.47%2.54%1.34%
XVV
iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF
0.95%0.94%1.05%1.25%1.57%0.81%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XVV and SDG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDG has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to XVV (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XVV dropped -27.20% vs SDG's -30.35%.

On 5-year performance, XVV leads with 12.69% vs -0.46% for SDG. On fees, XVV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XVV has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XVV has performed better with a 12.69% return vs -0.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XVV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SDG.

SDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.95% for XVV.

XVV is categorized as S&P 500, while SDG is Global Equities. XVV tracks S&P 500 Sustainablility Screened Index, while SDG tracks MSCI ACWI Sustainable Development Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XVV and 0.50% for SDG.

XVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XVV and SDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer