PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XVOL vs. DFAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XVOL vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF (XVOL) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XVOL vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XVOL
Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF
-2.57%9.52%20.00%7.42%-20.78%13.22%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
-3.36%16.78%23.17%24.79%-16.99%13.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XVOL achieves a -2.57% return, which is significantly higher than DFAU's -3.36% return.


XVOL

1D
2.15%
1M
-7.33%
YTD
-2.57%
6M
-2.90%
1Y
13.65%
3Y*
9.36%
5Y*
10Y*

DFAU

1D
2.90%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
-3.36%
6M
-0.90%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XVOL vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XVOL has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XVOL vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XVOL
XVOL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XVOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XVOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XVOL Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XVOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XVOL Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XVOL vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF (XVOL) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XVOLDFAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.01

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

1.53

-0.22

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.54

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.95

7.40

-1.45

XVOL vs. DFAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XVOL Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the DFAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XVOL and DFAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XVOLDFAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.01

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.79

-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between XVOL and DFAU is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XVOL vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison

XVOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than DFAU's 1.03% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
XVOL
Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF
2.01%1.95%3.13%1.09%2.86%0.30%0.00%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
1.03%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%

Drawdowns

XVOL vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XVOL drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, which is greater than DFAU's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XVOL and DFAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XVOLDFAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.82%

-23.61%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.42%

-12.45%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.33%

-6.03%

-1.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.74%

-5.12%

-4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.60%

-0.16%

Volatility

XVOL vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acruence Active Hedge U.S. Equity ETF (XVOL) is 4.80%, while Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that XVOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XVOLDFAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

5.37%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

9.65%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

18.51%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

17.04%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

16.88%

+0.62%