PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUTD.L vs. TRS5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUTD.L vs. TRS5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUTD.L achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly higher than TRS5.L's -0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XUTD.L has outperformed TRS5.L with an annualized return of 0.87%, while TRS5.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.80% annualized return.


XUTD.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
0.87%

TRS5.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
0.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUTD.L vs. TRS5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
-0.43%6.38%0.77%3.91%-12.78%-2.45%7.94%7.21%0.66%2.22%
TRS5.L
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-0.58%7.27%2.02%4.16%-9.49%-2.44%6.80%4.29%-0.46%-0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between XUTD.L and TRS5.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016

0.90

The correlation between XUTD.L and TRS5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUTD.L vs. TRS5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUTD.L
XUTD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

TRS5.L
TRS5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TRS5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUTD.L vs. TRS5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUTD.LTRS5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

4.36

-0.41

XUTD.L vs. TRS5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is comparable to the TRS5.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUTD.L and TRS5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUTD.LTRS5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

1.16

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.06

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.21

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.22

+0.21

Drawdowns

XUTD.L vs. TRS5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUTD.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, which is greater than TRS5.L's maximum drawdown of -14.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.L and TRS5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUTD.LTRS5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-14.35%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-2.48%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

-3.70%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.01%

-13.64%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

-14.35%

-5.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.72%

-1.78%

-5.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-4.40%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.77%

+0.22%

Volatility

XUTD.L vs. TRS5.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) at 1.14%. This indicates that XUTD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRS5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUTD.LTRS5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.14%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

2.14%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

2.91%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

4.71%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

3.81%

+1.25%

XUTD.L vs. TRS5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUTD.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TRS5.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUTD.L vs. TRS5.L - Dividend Comparison

XUTD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than TRS5.L's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TRS5.L
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
3.94%3.68%3.24%1.97%1.12%0.98%1.66%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
3.49%3.27%3.65%2.39%1.95%3.42%1.08%1.47%1.35%1.34%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, XUTD.L and TRS5.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TRS5.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRS5.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for XUTD.L.

XUTD.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while TRS5.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XUTD.L and 0.05% for TRS5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUTD.L and TRS5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer