TRS5.L vs. IBTM.L
TRS5.L (SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF) and IBTM.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Government Bonds funds - TRS5.L tracks the Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index while IBTM.L tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TRS5.L returned 0.80%/yr vs 1.53%/yr for IBTM.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRS5.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTM.L.
Performance
TRS5.L vs. IBTM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TRS5.L is traded in USD, while IBTM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRS5.L achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than IBTM.L's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, TRS5.L has underperformed IBTM.L with an annualized return of 0.80%, while IBTM.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.53% annualized return.
TRS5.L
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 3.55%
- 5Y*
- 0.27%
- 10Y*
- 0.80%
IBTM.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- 5.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
TRS5.L vs. IBTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRS5.L SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF | -0.58% | 7.27% | 2.02% | 4.16% | -9.49% | -2.44% | 6.80% | 4.29% | -0.46% | -0.42% |
IBTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.01% | 9.99% | 0.85% | 3.70% | -14.60% | -2.24% | 9.71% | 10.51% | 1.26% | 3.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRS5.L and IBTM.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016 | 0.70 |
The correlation between TRS5.L and IBTM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.78 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRS5.L vs. IBTM.L — Risk / Return Rank
TRS5.L
IBTM.L
TRS5.L vs. IBTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRS5.L | IBTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.40 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 4.48 | -0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRS5.L | IBTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.02 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.01 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.19 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.52 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
TRS5.L vs. IBTM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRS5.L drawdown since its inception was -14.35%, smaller than the maximum IBTM.L drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRS5.L and IBTM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRS5.L | IBTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -22.58% | +8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.48% | -4.18% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.70% | -7.61% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.64% | -20.39% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.35% | -22.58% | +8.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -6.08% | +4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -5.60% | +1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 1.31% | -0.54% |
Volatility
TRS5.L vs. IBTM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) is 1.14%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) has a volatility of 2.13%. This indicates that TRS5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRS5.L | IBTM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 2.13% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.14% | 4.19% | -2.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 5.77% | -2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 8.55% | -3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.81% | 7.87% | -4.06% |
TRS5.L vs. IBTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRS5.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTM.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TRS5.L vs. IBTM.L - Dividend Comparison
TRS5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than IBTM.L's 5.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTM.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | 5.82% | 5.55% | 5.00% | 3.93% | 2.34% | 1.57% | 2.13% | 3.25% | 3.07% | 2.64% | 2.40% | 3.01% |
TRS5.L SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF | 3.94% | 3.68% | 3.24% | 1.97% | 1.12% | 0.98% | 1.66% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRS5.L and IBTM.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRS5.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRS5.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTM.L.
TRS5.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index, while IBTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TRS5.L and 0.07% for IBTM.L.
Find the right allocation for TRS5.L and IBTM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer