PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUTD.L vs. UB82.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUTD.L vs. UB82.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XUTD.L is traded in USD, while UB82.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UB82.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUTD.L achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than UB82.L's -0.35% return.


XUTD.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-0.48%
10Y*
0.87%

UB82.L

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.05%
YTD
-0.35%
6M
-0.12%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
2.57%
5Y*
-1.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUTD.L vs. UB82.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
-0.43%6.38%0.77%3.91%-12.78%-2.45%7.94%7.21%0.66%-0.14%
UB82.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
-0.35%7.65%-1.31%2.10%-13.82%-2.74%8.92%9.60%-0.06%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XUTD.L and UB82.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2017

0.32

The correlation between XUTD.L and UB82.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUTD.L vs. UB82.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUTD.L
XUTD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

UB82.L
UB82.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UB82.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB82.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB82.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
UB82.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB82.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUTD.L vs. UB82.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUTD.LUB82.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.14

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.03

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

5.24

-1.29

XUTD.L vs. UB82.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUTD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the UB82.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUTD.L and UB82.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUTD.LUB82.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.79

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

-0.20

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.21

+0.22

Drawdowns

XUTD.L vs. UB82.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUTD.L drawdown since its inception was -19.61%, smaller than the maximum UB82.L drawdown of -23.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.L and UB82.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUTD.LUB82.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.61%

-23.30%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.05%

-1.94%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.47%

-7.17%

+1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.01%

-20.62%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.72%

-11.57%

+3.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-12.30%

+6.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.91%

+0.08%

Volatility

XUTD.L vs. UB82.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L) have volatilities of 1.40% and 1.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUTD.LUB82.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.46%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.62%

3.40%

-0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

4.99%

-1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

10.51%

-4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.06%

12.09%

-7.03%

XUTD.L vs. UB82.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUTD.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than UB82.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUTD.L vs. UB82.L - Dividend Comparison

XUTD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than UB82.L's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
UB82.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
3.10%2.20%2.52%2.82%1.33%0.99%1.81%1.93%2.69%0.00%0.00%
XUTD.L
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
3.49%3.27%3.65%2.39%1.95%3.42%1.08%1.47%1.35%1.34%2.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUTD.L and UB82.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB82.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB82.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for XUTD.L.

XUTD.L tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while UB82.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XUTD.L and 0.05% for UB82.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUTD.L and UB82.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer