PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRS5.L vs. IBTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRS5.L vs. IBTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRS5.L achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than IBTA.L's 0.32% return.


TRS5.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
3.55%
5Y*
0.27%
10Y*
0.80%

IBTA.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRS5.L vs. IBTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRS5.L
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-0.58%7.27%2.02%4.16%-9.49%-2.44%6.80%4.29%-0.46%-1.06%
IBTA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.32%5.30%4.11%4.15%-3.75%-0.64%3.14%3.58%1.44%-0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TRS5.L and IBTA.L is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017

0.78

The correlation between TRS5.L and IBTA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRS5.L vs. IBTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRS5.L
TRS5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TRS5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTA.L
IBTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRS5.L vs. IBTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRS5.LIBTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.59

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

4.65

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

17.57

-13.20

TRS5.L vs. IBTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRS5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the IBTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRS5.L and IBTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRS5.LIBTA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

2.82

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.92

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

1.08

-0.86

Drawdowns

TRS5.L vs. IBTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRS5.L drawdown since its inception was -14.35%, which is greater than IBTA.L's maximum drawdown of -5.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRS5.L and IBTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRS5.LIBTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-5.80%

-8.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

-0.74%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-0.89%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.64%

-5.70%

-7.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-0.27%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-0.97%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

0.20%

+0.57%

Volatility

TRS5.L vs. IBTA.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IBTA.L) at 0.41%. This indicates that TRS5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRS5.LIBTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

0.41%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

0.85%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

1.22%

+1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.71%

2.00%

+2.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.81%

1.76%

+2.05%

TRS5.L vs. IBTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRS5.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRS5.L vs. IBTA.L - Dividend Comparison

TRS5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, while IBTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBTA.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRS5.L
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
3.94%3.68%3.24%1.97%1.12%0.98%1.66%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRS5.L and IBTA.L have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRS5.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRS5.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTA.L.

TRS5.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index, while IBTA.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TRS5.L and 0.07% for IBTA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRS5.L and IBTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer