XUTD.DE vs. CBU0.DE
XUTD.DE (Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D) and CBU0.DE (iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XUTD.DE is a Government Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while CBU0.DE is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XUTD.DE returned 0.11%/yr vs 3.94%/yr for CBU0.DE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUTD.DE charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CBU0.DE.
Performance
XUTD.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUTD.DE achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than CBU0.DE's -0.89% return.
XUTD.DE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 1.80%
- 3Y*
- 0.11%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
CBU0.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- -0.89%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- 2.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XUTD.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XUTD.DE Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D | 1.08% | -5.37% | 6.37% | -2.57% |
CBU0.DE iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.89% | 4.58% | -0.25% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUTD.DE and CBU0.DE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2023 | 0.28 |
The correlation between XUTD.DE and CBU0.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUTD.DE vs. CBU0.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XUTD.DE
CBU0.DE
XUTD.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) and iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUTD.DE | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.09 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.46 | 0.58 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 1.62 | -0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUTD.DE | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | 0.48 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.45 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
XUTD.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUTD.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.01%, which is greater than CBU0.DE's maximum drawdown of -6.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.DE and CBU0.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUTD.DE | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.01% | -6.02% | -11.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.92% | -4.20% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.06% | -4.20% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.39% | -2.03% | -11.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.35% | -1.65% | -7.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 1.52% | +0.08% |
Volatility
XUTD.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) is 0.92%, while iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a volatility of 2.00%. This indicates that XUTD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBU0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUTD.DE | CBU0.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 2.00% | -1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.82% | 4.39% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.56% | 5.11% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.15% | 5.81% | +2.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.94% | 5.81% | +2.13% |
XUTD.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUTD.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CBU0.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUTD.DE vs. CBU0.DE - Dividend Comparison
XUTD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while CBU0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBU0.DE iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUTD.DE Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D | 3.47% | 3.43% | 3.53% | 2.45% | 1.97% | 3.26% | 1.18% | 1.46% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUTD.DE and CBU0.DE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUTD.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUTD.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CBU0.DE.
XUTD.DE is categorized as Government Bonds, while CBU0.DE is Corporate Bonds. XUTD.DE tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while CBU0.DE tracks iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XUTD.DE and 0.25% for CBU0.DE.
Find the right allocation for XUTD.DE and CBU0.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer