CBU0.DE vs. VDTA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDTA.L).
CBU0.DE and VDTA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CBU0.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iBoxx® GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Mar 22, 2023. VDTA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted index. It was launched on Feb 8, 2022. Both CBU0.DE and VDTA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
CBU0.DE vs. VDTA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CBU0.DE vs. VDTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBU0.DE iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -2.48% | 4.58% | -0.25% | 5.06% |
VDTA.L Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 1.30% | -6.36% | 7.60% | -2.34% |
Different Trading Currencies
CBU0.DE is traded in EUR, while VDTA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDTA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBU0.DE achieves a -2.48% return, which is significantly lower than VDTA.L's 1.30% return.
CBU0.DE
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -3.60%
- YTD
- -2.48%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 2.33%
- 3Y*
- 2.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VDTA.L
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- -3.46%
- 3Y*
- 0.44%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CBU0.DE vs. VDTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBU0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VDTA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
CBU0.DE vs. VDTA.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBU0.DE
VDTA.L
CBU0.DE vs. VDTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBU0.DE | VDTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.44 | -0.44 | +0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | -0.53 | +1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.93 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | -0.43 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | -0.64 | +2.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBU0.DE | VDTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | -0.44 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.11 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between CBU0.DE and VDTA.L is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CBU0.DE vs. VDTA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBU0.DE nor VDTA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CBU0.DE vs. VDTA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBU0.DE drawdown since its inception was -6.02%, smaller than the maximum VDTA.L drawdown of -17.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBU0.DE and VDTA.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBU0.DE | VDTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -18.82% | +12.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.20% | -3.28% | -0.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.60% | -7.02% | +3.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -8.13% | +6.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 1.28% | -0.23% |
Volatility
CBU0.DE vs. VDTA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (CBU0.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDTA.L) at 2.35%. This indicates that CBU0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CBU0.DE | VDTA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 2.35% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.45% | 4.41% | -0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.33% | 7.87% | -2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 8.41% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.69% | 8.26% | -2.57% |