PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XUTD.DE (Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D) and CEMF.DE (iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc) are both Government Bonds funds - XUTD.DE tracks the iBoxx USD Treasuries Index while CEMF.DE tracks the ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUTD.DE charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CEMF.DE.

Performance

XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUTD.DE achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than CEMF.DE's -1.42% return.

XUTD.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.88%
YTD
1.08%
6M
0.34%
1Y
1.80%
3Y*
0.11%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
0.68%

CEMF.DE

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-1.51%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
XUTD.DE
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D		1.08%0.93%
CEMF.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc		-1.42%2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XUTD.DE and CEMF.DE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D

iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc

Often compared with XUTD.DE:
XUTD.DE vs. VOOXUTD.DE vs. SPYXUTD.DE vs. BNDXUTD.DE vs. WTEC.LXUTD.DE vs. IUIT.LXUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DEXUTD.DE vs. VX6F.DE
Often compared with CEMF.DE:
CEMF.DE vs. BBTR.DECEMF.DE vs. OM3M.DECEMF.DE vs. QDVP.DECEMF.DE vs. SPP3.DECEMF.DE vs. SPP7.DECEMF.DE vs. TRDL.DECEMF.DE vs. PR1T.DE

Return for Risk

XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XUTD.DE
XUTD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XUTD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
CEMF.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (CEMF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XUTD.DECEMF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.32

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.50

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XUTD.DECEMF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.29

-0.23

Drawdowns

XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUTD.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.01%, which is greater than CEMF.DE's maximum drawdown of -4.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.DE and CEMF.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XUTD.DECEMF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.01%

-4.45%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.06%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.06%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.01%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.39%

-2.97%

-10.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-1.20%

-8.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

—

—

Volatility

XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XUTD.DECEMF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

4.62%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.15%

4.62%

+3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.94%

4.62%

+3.32%

XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUTD.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMF.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XUTD.DE vs. CEMF.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUTD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while CEMF.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CEMF.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUTD.DE
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D		3.47%3.43%3.53%2.45%1.97%3.26%1.18%1.46%1.26%1.51%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

XUTD.DE and CEMF.DE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUTD.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUTD.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for CEMF.DE.

XUTD.DE tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while CEMF.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 7-10 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XUTD.DE and 0.10% for CEMF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUTD.DE and CEMF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer