PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUTD.DE achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than 2B7S.DE's -0.08% return.


XUTD.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.88%
YTD
1.08%
6M
0.34%
1Y
1.80%
3Y*
0.11%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
0.68%

2B7S.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
1.30%
3Y*
2.30%
5Y*
-0.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XUTD.DE
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
1.08%-5.37%6.37%0.41%-7.33%5.48%
2B7S.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
-0.08%2.92%2.36%1.95%-5.70%-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between XUTD.DE and 2B7S.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2021

0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between XUTD.DE and 2B7S.DE has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUTD.DE
XUTD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XUTD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUTD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7S.DE
2B7S.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
2B7S.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7S.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUTD.DE2B7S.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.18

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

1.51

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.12

4.17

-3.05

XUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUTD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the 2B7S.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUTD.DE and 2B7S.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUTD.DE2B7S.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

1.00

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

-0.00

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

-0.00

+0.05

Drawdowns

XUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUTD.DE drawdown since its inception was -18.01%, which is greater than 2B7S.DE's maximum drawdown of -7.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUTD.DE and 2B7S.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUTD.DE2B7S.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.01%

-7.76%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.92%

-0.85%

-3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.06%

-1.14%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.06%

-7.72%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.39%

-0.58%

-12.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-3.30%

-6.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

0.31%

+1.29%

Volatility

XUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D (XUTD.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc (2B7S.DE) at 0.47%. This indicates that XUTD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2B7S.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUTD.DE2B7S.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.47%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.82%

0.92%

+2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

1.29%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.15%

1.99%

+6.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.94%

1.96%

+5.98%

XUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUTD.DE has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than 2B7S.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XUTD.DE vs. 2B7S.DE - Dividend Comparison

XUTD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while 2B7S.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
2B7S.DE
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR Hedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUTD.DE
Xtrackers II US Treasuries UCITS ETF 1D
3.47%3.43%3.53%2.45%1.97%3.26%1.18%1.46%1.26%1.51%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


XUTD.DE and 2B7S.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUTD.DE is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUTD.DE is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for 2B7S.DE.

XUTD.DE tracks iBoxx USD Treasuries Index, while 2B7S.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year (EUR Hedged) Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for XUTD.DE and 0.10% for 2B7S.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUTD.DE and 2B7S.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer