PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO

Last updated Jul 15, 2026
Documentation

XUT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF) and CINF.TO (CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool) are both Utilities Equities funds. XUT.TO is passively managed, while CINF.TO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUT.TO returned 6.98%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for CINF.TO. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XUT.TO having a 18.04% return and CINF.TO slightly lower at 17.91%.

XUT.TO

1D
0.24%
1M
1.47%
6M
17.78%
YTD
18.04%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
13.27%
5Y*
6.98%
10Y*
8.74%

CINF.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.29%
6M
16.22%
YTD
17.91%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
12.48%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XUT.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF		18.04%14.74%13.09%-0.45%-11.02%8.92%17.54%
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool		17.91%12.54%16.53%5.27%5.03%13.56%7.55%

Correlation

The correlation between XUT.TO and CINF.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2020

0.42

XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XUT.TO
CINF.TO

Utilities

90.5%
40.5%

Energy

9.5%
16.7%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

31.2%

Real Estate

-

9.8%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

XUT.TO
90.5%
CINF.TO
40.5%

Energy

XUT.TO
9.5%
CINF.TO
16.7%

Basic Materials

XUT.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Communication Services

XUT.TO

-

CINF.TO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XUT.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XUT.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Financial Services

XUT.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Healthcare

XUT.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Industrials

XUT.TO

-

CINF.TO
31.2%

Real Estate

XUT.TO

-

CINF.TO
9.8%

Technology

XUT.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF

CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool

Often compared with XUT.TO:
XUT.TO vs. ZUT.TOXUT.TO vs. ZLB.TOXUT.TO vs. XEI.TOXUT.TO vs. XIU.TOXUT.TO vs. XLUXUT.TO vs. UTES.TOXUT.TO vs. VPU
Often compared with CINF.TO:
CINF.TO vs. UTIL.TOCINF.TO vs. CMNY.TOCINF.TO vs. HUTL.TOCINF.TO vs. EHE.TOCINF.TO vs. ZUT.TOCINF.TO vs. UMVP.TOCINF.TO vs. HUTS.TO

Return for Risk

XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XUT.TO
XUT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XUT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XUT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
CINF.TO
CINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XUT.TOCINF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.56
2.31

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.30
3.16

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.42

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.99

4.15

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

12.29

-3.84

XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUT.TO and CINF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUT.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.65%, which is greater than CINF.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUT.TO and CINF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XUT.TOCINF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.65%

-12.27%

-25.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.64%

-5.31%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.51%

-9.62%

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.54%

-12.27%

-16.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.65%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-0.35%

-0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.78%

-2.05%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

1.79%

+0.91%

Volatility

XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF (XUT.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.39% compared to CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) at 1.98%. This indicates that XUT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XUT.TOCINF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

1.98%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

7.78%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.93%

9.55%

-0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.80%

11.96%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.16%

12.08%

+4.08%

Dividends

XUT.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison

XUT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, more than CINF.TO's 2.41% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool		2.41%2.80%3.06%3.45%3.51%3.56%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUT.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Utilities Index ETF		3.14%3.91%4.00%3.90%3.80%3.04%4.51%3.57%4.52%3.57%3.74%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

XUT.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUT.TO and CINF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer