PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUSP vs. XAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUSP vs. XAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUSP achieves a 12.67% return, which is significantly higher than XAPR's 3.39% return.


XUSP

1D
-0.86%
1M
7.03%
YTD
12.67%
6M
12.12%
1Y
33.74%
3Y*
25.24%
5Y*
10Y*

XAPR

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.66%
YTD
3.39%
6M
4.05%
1Y
8.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUSP vs. XAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XUSP and XAPR is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024

0.85

The correlation between XUSP and XAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUSP vs. XAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUSP
XUSP Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XUSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUSP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XUSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

XAPR
XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUSP vs. XAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUSPXAPRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

2.06

-0.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

13.37

-10.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.82

70.60

-58.77

XUSP vs. XAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUSP Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is lower than the XAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUSP and XAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUSPXAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

4.31

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

1.88

-0.84

Drawdowns

XUSP vs. XAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUSP drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, which is greater than XAPR's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSP and XAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUSPXAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.59%

-6.18%

-16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.13%

-0.66%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.16%

-0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-0.18%

-4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

0.12%

+2.74%

Volatility

XUSP vs. XAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) at 0.75%. This indicates that XUSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUSPXAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

0.75%

+3.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.89%

1.31%

+10.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

2.05%

+13.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

6.18%

+13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.21%

6.18%

+13.03%

XUSP vs. XAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUSP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than XAPR's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUSP vs. XAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither XUSP nor XAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XUSP and XAPR have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XUSP has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to XAPR (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUSP dropped -22.59% vs XAPR's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, XUSP leads with 33.74% vs 8.79% for XAPR. On fees, XUSP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 33.74% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XUSP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

XUSP and XAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XUSP and 0.85% for XAPR.

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUSP and XAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer