XAPR vs. CARY

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

XAPR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April) and CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XAPR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest, while CARY is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XAPR returned 8.52% vs 6.25% for CARY. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CARY.

Performance

XAPR vs. CARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XAPR achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly higher than CARY's 2.01% return.

XAPR

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 3.48%
• 1Y: 8.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CARY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.01%
• 6M: 2.15%
• 1Y: 6.25%
• 3Y*: 7.33%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XAPR vs. CARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	3.32%	12.57%	8.57%
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	2.01%	7.54%	6.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XAPR and CARY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024	0.18

Over the past year, XAPR and CARY have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

XAPR vs. CARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XAPR

XAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
XAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
XAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
XAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
XAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
XAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

CARY

CARY Risk / Return Rank: 93
CARY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CARY Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CARY Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CARY Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CARY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XAPR vs. CARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) and Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XAPR	CARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.63	3.49	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.72	5.42	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.90	1.76	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.72	4.91	+1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	48.07	21.11	+26.95

XAPR vs. CARY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.63, which is comparable to the CARY Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XAPR and CARY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XAPR vs. CARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XAPR drawdown since its inception was -6.18%, which is greater than CARY's maximum drawdown of -1.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XAPR and CARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	XAPR	CARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-1.96%	-4.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.27%	-1.28%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-0.19%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.18%	-0.32%	+0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	0.30%	-0.12%

Volatility

XAPR vs. CARY - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.47% compared to Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) at 0.62%. This indicates that XAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XAPR	CARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.47%	0.62%	+0.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.90%	1.39%	+0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36%	1.80%	+0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.18%	2.73%	+3.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.18%	2.73%	+3.45%

XAPR vs. CARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CARY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

XAPR vs. CARY - Dividend Comparison

XAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	5.92%	6.13%	6.10%	6.38%	0.48%
XAPR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XAPR and CARY in my portfolio?

XAPR and CARY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XAPR or CARY?

XAPR has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to CARY (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XAPR dropped -6.18% vs CARY's -1.96%.

Which ETF is better, XAPR or CARY?

On 1-year performance, XAPR leads with 8.52% vs 6.25% for CARY. On fees, CARY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, CARY has been the lower-risk option at 0.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XAPR or CARY?

Over the 1-year period, XAPR has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 6.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XAPR or CARY?

CARY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for XAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XAPR or CARY?

CARY has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 0.00% for XAPR.

What is the main difference between XAPR and CARY?

XAPR is categorized as Options Trading, while CARY is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for XAPR and 0.80% for CARY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 3.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.