XUSP vs. COMT
XUSP (Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUSP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XUSP returned 25.60%/yr vs 16.55%/yr for COMT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XUSP charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
XUSP vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUSP achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 38.58% return.
XUSP
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 7.26%
- YTD
- 13.64%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 36.05%
- 3Y*
- 25.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- 38.58%
- 6M
- 38.42%
- 1Y
- 47.00%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 9.01%
XUSP vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF | 13.64% | 18.27% | 30.60% | 26.46% | -9.24% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 38.58% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | -6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUSP and COMT is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2022 | 0.09 |
The correlation between XUSP and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XUSP vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUSP
COMT
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XUSP
COMT
-
Financial Services
XUSP
COMT
Communication Services
XUSP
COMT
-
Consumer Cyclical
XUSP
COMT
-
Healthcare
XUSP
COMT
-
Industrials
XUSP
COMT
-
Consumer Defensive
XUSP
COMT
-
Energy
XUSP
COMT
-
Utilities
XUSP
COMT
-
Real Estate
XUSP
COMT
-
Basic Materials
XUSP
COMT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUSP vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
XUSP
COMT
XUSP vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUSP | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | 2.22 | +0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.04 | 2.86 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 6.26 | -3.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 14.93 | -2.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUSP | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.22 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.20 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
XUSP vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUSP drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSP and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUSP | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -51.89% | +29.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -8.02% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.59% | -13.31% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.56% | +5.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -24.08% | +19.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.36% | -0.50% |
Volatility
XUSP vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) is 4.07%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that XUSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUSP | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 7.60% | -3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | 18.80% | -6.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.87% | 21.38% | -5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 21.07% | -1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.21% | 18.89% | +0.32% |
XUSP vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUSP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
XUSP vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
XUSP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.59% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUSP and COMT have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to XUSP (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUSP dropped -22.59% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 3-year performance, XUSP leads with 25.60% vs 16.55% for COMT. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, XUSP has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 25.60% return vs 16.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XUSP.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.59%, compared with 0.00% for XUSP.
XUSP is categorized as Options Trading, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XUSP and 0.48% for COMT.
XUSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XUSP and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer