XUSP vs. BAPR
XUSP (Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF) and BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - XUSP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator, while BAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. XUSP is actively managed, while BAPR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XUSP returned 23.03%/yr vs 14.48%/yr for BAPR. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
XUSP vs. BAPR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUSP achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than BAPR's 10.04% return.
XUSP
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- 8.52%
- 6M
- 7.07%
- 1Y
- 27.74%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BAPR
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 10.03%
- 1Y
- 18.64%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 10.86%
- 10Y*
- —
XUSP vs. BAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUSP Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF | 8.52% | 18.27% | 30.60% | 26.46% | -10.20% |
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 10.04% | 8.28% | 15.95% | 23.16% | -4.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUSP and BAPR is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between XUSP and BAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUSP vs. BAPR — Risk / Return Rank
XUSP
BAPR
XUSP vs. BAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XUSP | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.76 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 9.69 | -7.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.36 | 47.41 | -38.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XUSP vs. BAPR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUSP drawdown since its inception was -22.59%, smaller than the maximum BAPR drawdown of -23.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUSP and BAPR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUSP | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -23.91% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.13% | -1.93% | -10.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.59% | -15.58% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.51% | -0.93% | -3.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -2.58% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 0.39% | +2.58% |
Volatility
XUSP vs. BAPR - Volatility Comparison
Innovator Uncapped Accelerated U.S. Equity ETF (XUSP) has a higher volatility of 6.53% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) at 2.06%. This indicates that XUSP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUSP | BAPR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.53% | 2.06% | +4.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 4.91% | +8.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 5.79% | +11.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 11.51% | +7.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.33% | 13.09% | +6.24% |
XUSP vs. BAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XUSP and BAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
XUSP vs. BAPR - Dividend Comparison
Neither XUSP nor BAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, XUSP and BAPR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XUSP has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to BAPR (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUSP dropped -22.59% vs BAPR's -23.91%.
On 3-year performance, XUSP leads with 23.03% vs 14.48% for BAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XUSP has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 14.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XUSP and BAPR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
XUSP and BAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
XUSP is categorized as Options Trading, while BAPR is Defined Outcome.
BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XUSP and BAPR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer