BAPR vs. FFLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC).
BAPR and FFLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April. It was launched on Apr 1, 2019. FFLC is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 2, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BAPR or FFLC.
Correlation
The correlation between BAPR and FFLC is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BAPR vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BAPR:
0.50
FFLC:
0.38
BAPR:
0.82
FFLC:
0.69
BAPR:
1.12
FFLC:
1.10
BAPR:
0.48
FFLC:
0.40
BAPR:
1.85
FFLC:
1.47
BAPR:
4.02%
FFLC:
5.37%
BAPR:
14.53%
FFLC:
19.84%
BAPR:
-23.91%
FFLC:
-19.72%
BAPR:
-7.29%
FFLC:
-8.21%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAPR achieves a -3.69% return, which is significantly lower than FFLC's -3.25% return.
BAPR
-3.69%
9.82%
-3.90%
7.20%
9.83%
N/A
FFLC
-3.25%
14.33%
-6.33%
7.48%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAPR vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BAPR vs. FFLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BAPR
FFLC
BAPR vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BAPR vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison
BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 0.98% | 0.82% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 0.89% |
Drawdowns
BAPR vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAPR drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAPR and FFLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BAPR vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) is 8.36%, while Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) has a volatility of 10.85%. This indicates that BAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.