PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEM.L vs. EMSA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XUEM.L vs. EMSA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XUEM.L vs. EMSA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XUEM.L
Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D
-0.71%13.58%6.08%10.88%-19.42%-2.38%3.07%15.18%-0.58%
EMSA.L
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-1.21%13.11%5.32%9.71%-18.78%-3.11%6.03%15.79%-0.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEM.L achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly higher than EMSA.L's -1.21% return.


XUEM.L

1D
0.91%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
2.40%
1Y
10.05%
3Y*
9.06%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*

EMSA.L

1D
1.04%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
-1.21%
6M
1.60%
1Y
8.83%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
1.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XUEM.L vs. EMSA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUEM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than EMSA.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XUEM.L vs. EMSA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEM.L
XUEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XUEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

EMSA.L
EMSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EMSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
EMSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEM.L vs. EMSA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) and iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEM.LEMSA.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

1.31

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

1.91

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.28

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.87

+0.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.34

8.46

+1.87

XUEM.L vs. EMSA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the EMSA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEM.L and EMSA.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEM.LEMSA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

1.31

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.17

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.30

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between XUEM.L and EMSA.L is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XUEM.L vs. EMSA.L - Dividend Comparison

XUEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, while EMSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XUEM.L
Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D
5.37%5.30%6.79%5.27%5.92%8.49%4.18%0.61%
EMSA.L
iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XUEM.L vs. EMSA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEM.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, roughly equal to the maximum EMSA.L drawdown of -29.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEM.L and EMSA.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEM.LEMSA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.94%

-29.12%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.26%

-4.96%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

-28.91%

-1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-2.98%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-8.21%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

1.05%

-0.07%

Volatility

XUEM.L vs. EMSA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) is 2.28%, while iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) has a volatility of 2.58%. This indicates that XUEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMSA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XUEM.LEMSA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.58%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.32%

3.59%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.39%

6.73%

-0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.86%

8.39%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.91%

9.80%

+1.11%