XUEM.L vs. SBEM.L

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L).

XUEM.L and SBEM.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XUEM.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on May 9, 2018. SBEM.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Jan 29, 2016. Both XUEM.L and SBEM.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XUEM.L vs. SBEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XUEM.L vs. SBEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XUEM.L Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D	-0.80%	13.58%	6.08%	10.88%	-19.42%	-2.38%	3.07%	15.18%	-0.93%
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	-1.81%	15.52%	7.63%	11.53%	-19.84%	-2.19%	4.39%	15.36%	-1.55%

Different Trading Currencies

XUEM.L is traded in USD, while SBEM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SBEM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEM.L achieves a -0.80% return, which is significantly higher than SBEM.L's -1.81% return.

XUEM.L

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: -0.80%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 10.73%
• 3Y*: 8.86%
• 5Y*: 1.89%
• 10Y*: —

SBEM.L

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -3.31%
• YTD: -1.81%
• 6M: 1.34%
• 1Y: 11.78%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 2.25%
• 10Y*: 3.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUEM.L vs. SBEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUEM.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SBEM.L's 0.42% expense ratio.

SBEM.L

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis

XUEM.L

Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D

Return for Risk

XUEM.L vs. SBEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEM.L

XUEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
XUEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
XUEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
XUEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 82
XUEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
XUEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

SBEM.L

SBEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
SBEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
SBEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SBEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SBEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEM.L vs. SBEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XUEM.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.36	+0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	1.93	+0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.25	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	2.45	+0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.98	11.48	+0.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XUEM.L vs. SBEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the SBEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEM.L and SBEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XUEM.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	1.36	+0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.24	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.36	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.39	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between XUEM.L and SBEM.L is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XUEM.L vs. SBEM.L - Dividend Comparison

XUEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, less than SBEM.L's 6.70% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
XUEM.L Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D	5.37%	5.30%	6.79%	5.27%	5.92%	8.49%	4.18%	0.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SBEM.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis	6.70%	7.69%	6.28%	6.49%	5.72%	4.35%	4.92%	4.83%	4.47%	4.84%	2.27%

Drawdowns

XUEM.L vs. SBEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEM.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, roughly equal to the maximum SBEM.L drawdown of -30.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEM.L and SBEM.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XUEM.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.94%	-21.61%	-8.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.88%	-4.14%	+0.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.94%	-17.20%	-12.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-21.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.85%	-2.22%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.98%	-7.35%	-0.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	1.35%	-0.45%

Volatility

XUEM.L vs. SBEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) is 2.17%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (SBEM.L) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that XUEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XUEM.L	SBEM.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.17%	2.79%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.30%	4.59%	-1.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.33%	7.64%	-1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.86%	9.42%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.91%	10.50%	+0.41%