EMSA.L vs. QTOP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP).
EMSA.L and QTOP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMSA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2018. QTOP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. It was launched on Oct 23, 2024. Both EMSA.L and QTOP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
EMSA.L vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EMSA.L vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMSA.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -1.21% | 13.11% | -0.47% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | -4.91% | 22.19% | 5.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMSA.L achieves a -1.21% return, which is significantly higher than QTOP's -4.91% return.
EMSA.L
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- -1.21%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 8.83%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.41%
- 10Y*
- —
QTOP
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- -4.91%
- 6M
- -2.53%
- 1Y
- 27.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EMSA.L vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMSA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QTOP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EMSA.L vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank
EMSA.L
QTOP
EMSA.L vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMSA.L | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.17 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 1.78 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.21 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 7.54 | +0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMSA.L | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.17 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.68 | -0.38 |
Correlation
The correlation between EMSA.L and QTOP is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EMSA.L vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison
EMSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EMSA.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF | 0.41% | 0.38% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
EMSA.L vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMSA.L drawdown since its inception was -29.12%, which is greater than QTOP's maximum drawdown of -23.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSA.L and QTOP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMSA.L | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -23.28% | -5.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.96% | -12.88% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -8.35% | +5.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -4.12% | -4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 3.78% | -2.73% |
Volatility
EMSA.L vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) is 2.58%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that EMSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EMSA.L | QTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.58% | 7.24% | -4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.59% | 13.92% | -10.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.73% | 23.53% | -16.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.39% | 23.11% | -14.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.80% | 23.11% | -13.31% |