PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEM.L vs. VEMT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XUEM.L vs. VEMT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XUEM.L vs. VEMT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XUEM.L
Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D
-0.71%13.58%6.08%10.88%-19.42%-2.38%3.07%15.18%-0.93%
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
-0.91%11.92%6.28%8.89%-15.33%-1.46%5.67%14.07%-0.44%
Different Trading Currencies

XUEM.L is traded in USD, while VEMT.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VEMT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEM.L achieves a -0.71% return, which is significantly higher than VEMT.L's -0.91% return.


XUEM.L

1D
0.91%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
-0.71%
6M
2.40%
1Y
10.05%
3Y*
9.06%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*

VEMT.L

1D
0.81%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-0.91%
6M
1.63%
1Y
8.11%
3Y*
8.05%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XUEM.L vs. VEMT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XUEM.L and VEMT.L have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XUEM.L vs. VEMT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEM.L
XUEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XUEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VEMT.L
VEMT.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEM.L vs. VEMT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) and Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEM.LVEMT.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

1.21

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

1.73

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.21

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.05

+0.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.34

7.96

+2.37

XUEM.L vs. VEMT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the VEMT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEM.L and VEMT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEM.LVEMT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

1.21

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.28

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.38

-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between XUEM.L and VEMT.L is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XUEM.L vs. VEMT.L - Dividend Comparison

XUEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, less than VEMT.L's 5.93% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
XUEM.L
Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D
5.37%5.30%6.79%5.27%5.92%8.49%4.18%0.61%0.00%0.00%
VEMT.L
Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
5.93%6.17%5.74%5.56%4.88%3.81%4.47%4.46%4.44%4.81%

Drawdowns

XUEM.L vs. VEMT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEM.L drawdown since its inception was -29.94%, which is greater than VEMT.L's maximum drawdown of -24.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEM.L and VEMT.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEM.LVEMT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.94%

-14.64%

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.26%

-4.82%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

-11.41%

-18.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-1.81%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-5.95%

-2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

1.93%

-0.95%

Volatility

XUEM.L vs. VEMT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) is 2.28%, while Vanguard USD Emerging Markets Government Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VEMT.L) has a volatility of 2.44%. This indicates that XUEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEMT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XUEM.LVEMT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.44%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.32%

4.26%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.39%

6.71%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.86%

8.11%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.91%

8.66%

+2.25%