EMSA.L vs. SEMH.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEMH.L).

EMSA.L and SEMH.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EMSA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Sep 24, 2018. SEMH.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD. It was launched on Nov 12, 2014. Both EMSA.L and SEMH.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EMSA.L vs. SEMH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEMH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EMSA.L vs. SEMH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EMSA.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-1.21%	13.11%	5.32%	9.71%	-18.78%	-3.11%	6.03%	15.79%	-0.63%
SEMH.L SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF	-0.09%	8.12%	4.70%	5.70%	-6.90%	0.06%	1.99%	6.37%	0.31%

Different Trading Currencies

EMSA.L is traded in USD, while SEMH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SEMH.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMSA.L achieves a -1.21% return, which is significantly lower than SEMH.L's -0.09% return.

EMSA.L

• 1D: 1.04%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -1.21%
• 6M: 1.60%
• 1Y: 8.83%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 1.41%
• 10Y*: —

SEMH.L

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: -0.09%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 5.58%
• 3Y*: 5.84%
• 5Y*: 2.26%
• 10Y*: 2.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMSA.L vs. SEMH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMSA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SEMH.L's 0.42% expense ratio.

EMSA.L

iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

SEMH.L

SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

EMSA.L vs. SEMH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMSA.L

EMSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 70
EMSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EMSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EMSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
EMSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
EMSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

SEMH.L

SEMH.L Risk / Return Rank: 21
SEMH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SEMH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
SEMH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
SEMH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SEMH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMSA.L vs. SEMH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) and SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEMH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EMSA.L	SEMH.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	1.24	+0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	1.84	+0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.22	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.87	2.54	-0.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.46	11.28	-2.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EMSA.L vs. SEMH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the SEMH.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMSA.L and SEMH.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EMSA.L	SEMH.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	1.24	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.37	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.39	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between EMSA.L and SEMH.L is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

EMSA.L vs. SEMH.L - Dividend Comparison

EMSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEMH.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMSA.L iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SEMH.L SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF	4.85%	4.97%	4.24%	3.18%	2.39%	2.72%	3.42%	3.52%	2.69%	3.13%	2.55%	1.76%

Drawdowns

EMSA.L vs. SEMH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMSA.L drawdown since its inception was -29.12%, which is greater than SEMH.L's maximum drawdown of -12.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMSA.L and SEMH.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMSA.L	SEMH.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.12%	-13.63%	-15.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.96%	-4.52%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-13.61%	-15.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-13.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.98%	-1.72%	-1.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.21%	-5.61%	-2.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	2.28%	-1.23%

Volatility

EMSA.L vs. SEMH.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares J.P. Morgan ESG USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMSA.L) has a higher volatility of 2.58% compared to SPDR ICE BofA 0-5 Year EM USD Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEMH.L) at 1.82%. This indicates that EMSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEMH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMSA.L	SEMH.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	1.82%	+0.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.59%	3.29%	+0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.73%	4.49%	+2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.39%	6.06%	+2.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.80%	6.23%	+3.57%