XUEK.L vs. XNAQ.L
XUEK.L (Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF) and XNAQ.L (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XUEK.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while XNAQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XUEK.L returned 6.75%/yr vs 18.96%/yr for XNAQ.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XUEK.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XNAQ.L.
Performance
XUEK.L vs. XNAQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XUEK.L is traded in GBp, while XNAQ.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNAQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUEK.L achieves a 5.66% return, which is significantly lower than XNAQ.L's 19.89% return.
XUEK.L
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- YTD
- 5.66%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 15.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- —
XNAQ.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 9.63%
- YTD
- 19.89%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 41.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.81%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- —
XUEK.L vs. XNAQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XUEK.L Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF | 5.66% | 23.26% | 0.43% | 12.46% | -11.69% | 16.41% |
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 19.89% | 11.71% | 28.62% | 47.83% | -25.44% | 26.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUEK.L and XNAQ.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.56 |
The correlation between XUEK.L and XNAQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
XUEK.L vs. XNAQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Industrials
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Healthcare
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Technology
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Consumer Defensive
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Utilities
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Basic Materials
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Energy
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Communication Services
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Real Estate
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUEK.L vs. XNAQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
XUEK.L
XNAQ.L
XUEK.L vs. XNAQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUEK.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.50 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 3.79 | -2.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | 11.13 | -6.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUEK.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 2.83 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 1.00 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.93 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
XUEK.L vs. XNAQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUEK.L drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, roughly equal to the maximum XNAQ.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEK.L and XNAQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUEK.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -27.52% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.88% | -10.99% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.04% | -24.56% | +11.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.76% | -27.52% | +3.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -0.63% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.45% | -7.01% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.75% | -0.61% |
Volatility
XUEK.L vs. XNAQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF (XUEK.L) is 3.83%, while Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XNAQ.L) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that XUEK.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XNAQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUEK.L | XNAQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 4.18% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 10.38% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 14.73% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 19.04% | -4.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 19.13% | -2.76% |
XUEK.L vs. XNAQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUEK.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XNAQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUEK.L vs. XNAQ.L - Dividend Comparison
XUEK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while XNAQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XNAQ.L Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUEK.L Xtrackers S&P Europe ex UK UCITS ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.05% | 0.01% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUEK.L and XNAQ.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUEK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUEK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XNAQ.L.
XUEK.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while XNAQ.L is Nasdaq-100. XUEK.L tracks MSCI Europe Ex UK NR EUR, while XNAQ.L tracks Russell 1000 Growth TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUEK.L and 0.20% for XNAQ.L.
Find the right allocation for XUEK.L and XNAQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer