PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XUEB.DE vs. XQUD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XUEB.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XUEB.DE achieves a 3.66% return, which is significantly higher than XQUD.DE's 1.98% return.


XUEB.DE

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.42%
YTD
3.66%
6M
3.08%
1Y
10.76%
3Y*
7.25%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*

XQUD.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
1.09%
YTD
1.98%
6M
0.94%
1Y
6.30%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XUEB.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XUEB.DE
Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C
3.66%1.23%11.99%7.34%1.97%
XQUD.DE
Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF
1.98%-1.36%5.23%3.70%-0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XUEB.DE and XQUD.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2022

0.93

The correlation between XUEB.DE and XQUD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XUEB.DE vs. XQUD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XUEB.DE
XUEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XUEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

XQUD.DE
XQUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XQUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XUEB.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) and Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XUEB.DEXQUD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

1.56

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.83

4.64

+6.19

XUEB.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XUEB.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is higher than the XQUD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XUEB.DE and XQUD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XUEB.DEXQUD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

1.04

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.29

-0.04

Drawdowns

XUEB.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XUEB.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, which is greater than XQUD.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUEB.DE and XQUD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XUEB.DEXQUD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-12.01%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.70%

-3.84%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-11.40%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-2.99%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-5.54%

-0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.30%

-0.34%

Volatility

XUEB.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2C (XUEB.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.29% compared to Xtrackers ESG USD Emerging Markets Bond Quality Weighted UCITS ETF (XQUD.DE) at 1.12%. This indicates that XUEB.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQUD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XUEB.DEXQUD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.29%

1.12%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.95%

3.74%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.93%

5.77%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.74%

7.98%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.56%

7.98%

+0.58%

XUEB.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XUEB.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XQUD.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

XUEB.DE vs. XQUD.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XUEB.DE nor XQUD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, XUEB.DE and XQUD.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUEB.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for XQUD.DE.

XUEB.DE tracks JPM EMBI Global Diversified TR USD, while XQUD.DE tracks iBoxx® MSCI ESG USD Emerging Markets Sovereigns Quality Weighted. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XUEB.DE and 0.45% for XQUD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XUEB.DE and XQUD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer