XUDV vs. XRPZ
XUDV (Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUDV is a Dividend fund tracking the VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while XRPZ is a Blockchain fund tracking the CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. XUDV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XRPZ.
Performance
XUDV vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUDV achieves a 25.74% return, which is significantly higher than XRPZ's -41.14% return.
XUDV
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- YTD
- 25.74%
- 1Y
- 33.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 22.60%
XRPZ
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -33.22%
- YTD
- -41.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | $2.54M | $2.64M | $3.44M |
| $488.33K | $320.23K | $391.69K |
XUDV vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 25.74% | 3.95% |
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | -41.14% | -11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUDV and XRPZ is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUDV vs. XRPZ — Risk / Return Rank
XUDV
XRPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XUDV vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XUDV | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.66 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XUDV vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUDV drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum XRPZ drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUDV and XRPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUDV | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -55.39% | +39.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -53.40% | +52.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -35.22% | +33.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | — | — |
Volatility
XUDV vs. XRPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUDV | XRPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.83% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.32% | 69.23% | -56.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 69.23% | -53.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.98% | 69.23% | -53.25% |
XUDV vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUDV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUDV vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison
XUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, while XRPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 3.32% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUDV and XRPZ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XUDV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUDV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for XRPZ.
XUDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for XRPZ.
XUDV is categorized as Dividend, while XRPZ is Blockchain. XUDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while XRPZ tracks CME CF XRP-Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUDV and 0.19% for XRPZ.
Find the right allocation for XUDV and XRPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer