XUDV vs. SPYD
XUDV (Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF) and SPYD (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XUDV is a Dividend fund tracking the VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while SPYD is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XUDV returned 29.58% vs 16.38% for SPYD. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XUDV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SPYD.
Performance
XUDV vs. SPYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XUDV achieves a 19.02% return, which is significantly higher than SPYD's 10.34% return.
XUDV
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 19.02%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 29.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYD
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 10.97%
- 1Y
- 16.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
XUDV vs. SPYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 19.02% | 8.24% |
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 10.34% | 3.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XUDV and SPYD is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XUDV and SPYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
XUDV vs. SPYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XUDV
SPYD
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
XUDV
SPYD
Technology
XUDV
SPYD
Consumer Defensive
XUDV
SPYD
Industrials
XUDV
SPYD
Healthcare
XUDV
SPYD
Energy
XUDV
SPYD
Consumer Cyclical
XUDV
SPYD
Communication Services
XUDV
SPYD
Utilities
XUDV
SPYD
Basic Materials
XUDV
SPYD
Real Estate
XUDV
-
SPYD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XUDV vs. SPYD — Risk / Return Rank
XUDV
SPYD
XUDV vs. SPYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XUDV | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.24 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.69 | 2.33 | +2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.94 | 6.77 | +9.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XUDV | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 1.42 | +1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.47 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
XUDV vs. SPYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XUDV drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum SPYD drawdown of -46.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XUDV and SPYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XUDV | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -46.42% | +30.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.34% | -7.05% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -1.11% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -6.17% | +4.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.43% | -0.57% |
Volatility
XUDV vs. SPYD - Volatility Comparison
Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF (XUDV) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF (SPYD) at 2.57%. This indicates that XUDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XUDV | SPYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 2.57% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 7.71% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 11.62% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 16.13% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.34% | 19.78% | -3.44% |
XUDV vs. SPYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XUDV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYD's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XUDV vs. SPYD - Dividend Comparison
XUDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than SPYD's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYD State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 High Dividend ETF | 4.21% | 4.52% | 4.31% | 4.66% | 5.01% | 3.68% | 4.95% | 4.42% | 4.75% | 4.63% | 4.34% | 1.13% |
XUDV Franklin U.S. Dividend Booster Index ETF | 3.48% | 3.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XUDV and SPYD have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XUDV has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to SPYD (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XUDV dropped -15.98% vs SPYD's -46.42%.
On 1-year performance, XUDV leads with 29.58% vs 16.38% for SPYD. On fees, SPYD is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SPYD has been the lower-risk option at 2.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XUDV has performed better with a 29.58% return vs 16.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYD is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XUDV.
SPYD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.48% for XUDV.
XUDV is categorized as Dividend, while SPYD is S&P 500. XUDV tracks VettaFi New Frontier U.S. Dividend Select Index, while SPYD tracks S&P 500 High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XUDV and 0.07% for SPYD.
XUDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XUDV and SPYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer