XTWO vs. PULS
Compare and contrast key facts about Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS).
XTWO and PULS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XTWO is a passively managed fund by BondBloxx that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury 2 Year Target Duration Index. It was launched on Sep 13, 2022. PULS is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Apr 5, 2018.
Performance
XTWO vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XTWO vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTWO Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 0.27% | 5.17% | 3.92% | 4.27% | 0.17% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 0.89% | 4.97% | 6.12% | 6.26% | 1.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTWO achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than PULS's 0.89% return.
XTWO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PULS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.98%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XTWO vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTWO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XTWO vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank
XTWO
PULS
XTWO vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTWO | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.44 | 9.19 | -6.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.86 | 18.25 | -14.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 5.27 | -3.75 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 13.80 | -9.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.27 | 95.35 | -80.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTWO | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.44 | 9.19 | -6.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 5.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.78 | 2.46 | -0.68 |
Correlation
The correlation between XTWO and PULS is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XTWO vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
XTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, less than PULS's 5.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTWO Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF | 4.10% | 4.24% | 4.54% | 4.07% | 1.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 5.09% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
XTWO vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTWO drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, smaller than the maximum PULS drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTWO and PULS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTWO | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -5.85% | +4.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.91% | -0.34% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | 0.00% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -0.09% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.05% | +0.20% |
Volatility
XTWO vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
Bondbloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) has a higher volatility of 0.56% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.15%. This indicates that XTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XTWO | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.56% | 0.15% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.90% | 0.28% | +0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56% | 0.51% | +1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 0.70% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.20% | 1.34% | +0.86% |