PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XTWO vs. BBBI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XTWO vs. BBBI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XTWO achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than BBBI's 0.80% return.


XTWO

1D
0.11%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.66%
1Y
2.98%
3Y*
4.23%
5Y*
10Y*

BBBI

1D
0.31%
1M
0.94%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.73%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XTWO vs. BBBI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XTWO and BBBI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.75

The correlation between XTWO and BBBI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XTWO vs. BBBI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XTWO
XTWO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
XTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
XTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BBBI
BBBI Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BBBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBBI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BBBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBBI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XTWO vs. BBBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) and BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XTWOBBBIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.23

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.81

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

5.91

+5.32

XTWO vs. BBBI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the BBBI Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XTWO and BBBI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XTWO vs. BBBI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XTWO drawdown since its inception was -1.73%, smaller than the maximum BBBI drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTWO and BBBI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XTWOBBBIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-4.11%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.91%

-2.94%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.71%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.40%

-0.98%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

0.90%

-0.63%

Volatility

XTWO vs. BBBI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XTWO) is 0.50%, while BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF (BBBI) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that XTWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XTWOBBBIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

1.26%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

3.12%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39%

4.03%

-2.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.16%

5.00%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.16%

5.00%

-2.84%

XTWO vs. BBBI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XTWO has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BBBI's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XTWO vs. BBBI - Dividend Comparison

XTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than BBBI's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BBBI
BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.77%4.90%4.61%0.00%0.00%
XTWO
BondBloxx Bloomberg Two Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF
4.04%4.24%4.54%4.07%1.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


XTWO and BBBI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBBI has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to XTWO (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTWO dropped -1.73% vs BBBI's -4.11%.

On 1-year performance, BBBI leads with 5.29% vs 2.98% for XTWO. On fees, XTWO is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, XTWO has been the lower-risk option at 0.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBBI has performed better with a 5.29% return vs 2.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTWO is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BBBI.

BBBI has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 4.04% for XTWO.

XTWO is categorized as Government Bonds, while BBBI is Corporate Bonds. XTWO tracks Bloomberg US Treasury 2 Year Target Duration Index, while BBBI tracks Bloomberg U.S. Corporate BBB 5-10 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for XTWO and 0.19% for BBBI.

XTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XTWO and BBBI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer