XTR vs. XYLD
XTR (Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XTR is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index, while XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XTR returned 18.55%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for XYLD. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XTR charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
XTR vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XTR achieves a 8.67% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.96% return.
XTR
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 8.67%
- 6M
- 8.51%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 18.55%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
XTR vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 8.67% | 13.66% | 21.85% | 21.16% | -17.67% | 4.43% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.96% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 5.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between XTR and XYLD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.84 |
The correlation between XTR and XYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
XTR vs. XYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XTR
XYLD
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
XTR
XYLD
Financial Services
XTR
XYLD
Communication Services
XTR
XYLD
Consumer Cyclical
XTR
XYLD
Healthcare
XTR
XYLD
Industrials
XTR
XYLD
Consumer Defensive
XTR
XYLD
Energy
XTR
XYLD
Utilities
XTR
XYLD
Real Estate
XTR
XYLD
Basic Materials
XTR
XYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XTR vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
XTR
XYLD
XTR vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XTR | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.64 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 3.35 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 17.84 | -6.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XTR | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.71 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.60 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
XTR vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XTR drawdown since its inception was -20.83%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XTR and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XTR | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -33.46% | +12.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -5.29% | -3.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -15.53% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.15% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -3.72% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 0.99% | +1.00% |
Volatility
XTR vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) has a higher volatility of 2.99% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that XTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XTR | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 0.88% | +2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.16% | 5.37% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.76% | 6.55% | +4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 11.22% | +2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.78% | 14.21% | -0.43% |
XTR vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XTR has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XTR vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
XTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.40%, more than XYLD's 10.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF | 16.40% | 17.82% | 20.89% | 1.09% | 1.08% | 2.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.52% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XTR and XYLD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTR has higher volatility (2.99%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XTR dropped -20.83% vs XYLD's -33.46%.
On 3-year performance, XTR leads with 18.55% vs 11.27% for XYLD. On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XTR has performed better with a 18.55% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.40%, compared with 10.52% for XYLD.
XTR is categorized as Equity Hedged, while XYLD is Derivative Income. XTR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index, while XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XTR and 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XTR and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer